The Indian Journal of Chest Diseases and Allied Sciences

Register      Login

VOLUME 57 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2015 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Evaluation of Metered Dose Inhaler Use Technique and Response to Educational Training

G.P. Jolly, A. Mohan, R. Guleria, Rosemary Poulose, J. George

Keywords : Inhaler therapy, COPD, Patient education, MDI

Citation Information : Jolly G, Mohan A, Guleria R, Poulose R, George J. Evaluation of Metered Dose Inhaler Use Technique and Response to Educational Training. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 2015; 57 (1):17-20.

DOI: 10.5005/ijcdas-57-1-17

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 17-11-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: Prescribing inhalers without imparting adequate education regarding proper technique of their usage may result in suboptimal clinical improvement and wastage of medication. Training interventions using a standard check-list may help improve faulty techniques and enhance drug efficacy. Methods: Patients using metered dose inhaler (MDI) were included in the study. Inhaler technique was first evaluated at baseline using a standard check-list of recommended steps (National Institute of Health guidelines; see Table) and scores were given for each step correctly performed. Those who could not perform all steps correctly were given training intervention. The patients were assigned to two methods of educational intervention; one group was trained by providing written material giving step-wise instructions while the other group was given an actual physical demonstration using a placebo device. The technique was re-evaluated and scored following each educational session, and continued till the patient achieved a full score, or for a maximum of 3 sessions, whichever occurred earlier. Median score was calculated after each session and was compared between the two groups. Each patient was followed up after two months and the re-evaluated the same way. Results: One hundred and seventeen subjects were enrolled in the study (59 in the written group and 57 in the practical demonstration group). At baseline, only 1 of the 117 subjects could perform all the steps of inhaler usage correctly. This patient was, therefore, not provided the inhaler technique education. The overall median (range) score of the whole group was 3 (range 1-8). This score rose to 6, 7 and 8 after each of the three subsequent educational intervention sessions. At one-month follow-up, the median score dropped to 7 and improved with a repeat educational session as previously done. A significant difference was observed in the median score improvement achieved in the practical demonstration group compared with the written instruction group (3.0 versus 2.0 respectively, p<0.001). Conclusions: Inhalation technique of patients improves after imparting systematic educational intervention. A practical demonstration of all the steps proved more effective than simple verbal/written advice. In view of increasing errors being committed over a period of time, repeated demonstration of the proper technique using a standard check-list significantly improves the errors committed during inhaler use.


PDF Share
  1. Virchow JC, Crompton GK, Dal Negro R, Pedersen S, Magnan A, Seidenberg J, et al. Importance of inhaler devices in the management of airway disease. Respir Med 2008;102:10-19.
  2. Melani AS, Canessa P, Coloretti I, DeAngelis G, DeTullio R, Del Donno M, et al. Inhaler mishandling is very common in patients with chronic airflow obstruction and long-term home nebuliser use. Respir Med 2012;106:668-76.
  3. Capstick TG, Clifton IJ. Inhaler technique and training in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med 2012;6:91-101.
  4. Coelho AC, Souza-Machado A, Leite M, Almeida P, Castro L, Cruz CS, et al. Use of inhaler devices and asthma control in severe asthma patients at a referral center in the city of Salvador, Brazil. J Bras Pneumol 2011;37:720-8.
  5. Souza ML, Meneghini AC, Ferraz E, Vianna EO, Borges MC. Knowledge of and technique for using inhalation devices among asthma patients and COPD patients. J Bras Pneumol 2009;35:824-31.
  6. Melani AS, Zanchetta D, Barbato N, Sestini P, Cinti C, Canessa PA, et al. Inhalation technique and variables associated with misuse of conventional metered-dose inhalers and newer dry powder inhalers in experienced adults. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2004;93:439-46.
  7. Melani AS. Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the physician. Biomed 2007;78:233-45.
  8. Larsen JS, Hahn M, Ekholm B, Wick KA. Evaluation of conventional press-and-breathe metered-dose inhaler technique in 501 patients. J Asthma 1994;31:193-9.
  9. Thompson J, Irvine T, Grathwohl K, Roth B. Misuse of metered-dose inhalers in hospitalized patients. Chest 1994;105:715-7.
  10. Dolovich MB, Ahrens RC, Hess DR, Anderson P, Dhand R, Rau JL, et al. Device selection and outcomes of aerosol therapy: evidence-based guidelines. American College of Chest Physicians/American College of Asthma, Allergy, and Immunology. Chest 2005;127:335-71.
  11. Basheti IA, Reddel HK, Armour CL, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ. Improved asthma outcomes with a simple inhaler technique intervention by community pharmacists. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007;119:1537-8.
  12. Self TH, Brooks JB, Lieberman P, Ryan MR. The value of demonstration and role of the pharmacist in teaching the correct use of pressurized bronchodilators. Canadian Med Assoc J 1983;128:129-31.
  13. Vaswani SK, Creticos PS. Metered dose inhaler: past, present, and future. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1998;80:11-21.
  14. van der Palen J, Klein JJ, Kerkhoff AH, van Herwaarden CL, Seydel ER. Evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of three instruction modes for inhaling medicines. Patient Educ Couns 1997;32 (Suppl. 1): S87-S95.
  15. Lindgren S, Bake B, Larsson S. Clinical consequences of inadequate inhalation technique in asthma therapy. Eur J Respir Dis 1987;70:93-8.
  16. Hilman B. Aerosol deposition and delivery of therapeutic aerosols. J Asthma 1991;28:239-42.
  17. Labrune S, Chinet T, Huchon G. Inhaled therapy in asthma: metered-dose inhaler experience. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 1994;49:254-7.
  18. Crompton GK. The adult patient's difficulties with inhalers. Lung 1990;168 (Suppl.):658-62.
  19. Crompton GK, Barnes PJ, Broeders M, Corrigan C, Corbetta L, Dekhuijzen R, et al. The need to improve inhalation technique in Europe: a report from the Aerosol Drug Management Improvement Team. Respir Med 2006;100:1479-94.
  20. Fink JB, Rubin BK. Problems with inhaler usage: a call for improved clinician and patient education. Respir Care 2005;50:1360-74.
  21. Bosnic-Anticevich SZ, Sinha H, So S, Reddel HK. Metered dose inhaler technique: the effect of two educational interventions delivered in community pharmacy over time. J Asthma 2010;47:251-6.
  22. Guidry GG, Brown WD, Stogner SW, George RB. Incorrect use of metered dose inhalers by medical personnel. Chest 1992;101:31-3.
  23. National Institute of Health. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma summary report. National asthma education and prevention program. Expert panel report 3: NIH Publication 2007;59-60.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.