The Indian Journal of Chest Diseases and Allied Sciences

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  66 (2024)
Volume  65 (2023)
Volume  64 (2022)
Volume  63 (2021)
Volume  62 (2020)
Volume  61 (2019)
Volume  60 (2018)
Volume  59 (2017)
Volume  58 (2016)
Volume  57 (2015)
Volume  56 (2014)
Volume  55 (2013)
Volume  54 (2012)
Volume  53 (2011)
Volume  52 (2010)
Related articles

VOLUME 57 , ISSUE 3 ( July-September, 2015 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Quantification of Emphysema in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Volumetric Computed Tomography of Lung

Lalita Fernandes, Nandani Gulati, Anthony M. Mesquita, Mahesh Sardesai, Yasmin Fernandes

Keywords : COPD, Volumetric CT, Low attenuation volume (LAV), Percentage emphysema and Hounsfield Units

Citation Information : Fernandes L, Gulati N, Mesquita AM, Sardesai M, Fernandes Y. Quantification of Emphysema in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Volumetric Computed Tomography of Lung. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 2015; 57 (3):155-160.

DOI: 10.5005/ijcdas-57-3-155

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 18-11-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background and Objectives. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with small airway inflammation and emphysema. Emphysema is permanent enlargement of air spaces distal to terminal bronchioles accompanied by destruction of alveolar walls. These morphological changes can be studied on quantitative computed tomography (CT). Methods. Thirty-four patients diagnosed to have COPD as per Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines underwent chest CT using full inspiration with low dose radiation protocol. Pulmo-CT® software was used to analyse the scans. The primary aim was to quantify emphysema and emphysema clusters and secondary aim was to assess correlation between percentage emphysema and lung function. Results. Their mean [standard deviation (SD)] age was 66.4 (7.0) years; 11 (32.4%) were current smokers (median pack years 45.5). Their mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1%) was 55.6 (17.6), mean (SD) % emphysema was 26.8 (11.1), mean (SD) lung density was –848.35 (29.5) Hounsfield units (HU), median (interquartile range) %cluster class 4 emphysema was 22.4 (13.5–32.6). There was no significant difference in %low attenuation volume (%LAV) in current and ex-smokers (p=0.4); across various severity grades of COPD (p=0.15). Further, no significant correlation was observed between %emphysema and post-bronchodilator FEV1%. Conclusions. Volumetric CT can detect and quantify emphysema. Majority of emphysema clusters in COPD are >25mm. The %emphysema does not correlate to the severity of the disease. Quantitative CT is a good objective method to study emphysema and can be used to phenotype COPD radiologically.

PDF Share
  1. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2014. Available from URL: http://www.goldcopd.org. Accessed on August 21, 2015.
  2. Nakano Y, Muro S, Sakai H, Hirai T, Chin K, Tsukino M, et al. Computed tomographic measurements of airway dimensions and emphysema in smokers: correlation with lung function. Am J Respir Crit Care 2000;162:1102–8.
  3. Coxson HO, Rogers RM. Quantitative computed tomography of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Acad Radiol 2005;12:1457–63.
  4. Madani A, Zanen J, de Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA. Pulmonary emphysema: objective quantification at multidetector row CT—Comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. Radiology 2006;238:1036–43.
  5. Matsuoka S, Kurihara Y, Yagihasi K, Nakajima Y. Quantitative thin-section CT analysis of the enlargement and coalescence of low-attenuation clusters in patients with emphysema. Respiration 2007;74:136–41.
  6. Coxson HO. Quantitative chest tomography in COPD research: chairman's summary. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008;5:874–7.
  7. Hayhurst MD, MacNee W, Flenley DC, Wright D, McLean A, Lamb D, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema by computerised tomography. Lancet 1984;2:320–2.
  8. Muller NL, Staples CA, Miller RR, Abboud RT. “Density Mask”. An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. Chest 1988;94:782–7.
  9. Kinsella M, Muller NL, Abboud RT, Morrison NJ, DyBuncio A. Quantification of emphysema by computed tomography using a “density mask” program and correlation with pulmonary function tests. Chest 1990;97:315–21.
  10. Gevenois PA, de Maertelaer V, De Vuyst P, Zanen J, Yernault JC. Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:653–7.
  11. Gevenois PA, De Vuyst P, de Maertelaer V, Zanen J, Jacobovitz D, Cosio MG, et al. Comparison of computed desity and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:187–92.
  12. Hersh CP, Washko GR, Jacobson FL, Gill R, Estepar RS, Reilly JJ, et al. Interobserver variability in the determination of upper lobe predominant emphysema. Chest 2007;131:424–31.
  13. Miller RR, Muller NL, Veda S, Morrison NJ, Staples CA. Limitation of computed tomography in the assessment of emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;139:980–3.
  14. Temizoz O, Etlik O, Sakarya ME, Uzun K, Arslan H, Harman M, et al. Detection and quantification of the parenchymal abnormalities in emphysema using pulmo-CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2007;31:542–8.
  15. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R and Coates A; ATS/ERS Task Force. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005;26:319–38.
  16. Stolk J, Dirksen A, van der Lugt AA, Hutsebaut J, Mathieu J, de Ree J, et al. Repeatability of lung density measurements with low-dose computed tomography in subjects with alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency-associated emphysema. Invest Radiol 2001;36:648–51.
  17. Heussel CP, Herth FJ, Kappes J, Hantusch R, Hartlieb S, Weinheimer O, et al. Fully automatic quantitative assessment of emphysema in computed tomography: comparison with pulmonary function testing and normal values. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2391–402.
  18. Mets OM, van Hulst RA, Jacobs C, van Ginneken B, de Jong PA. Normal range of emphysema and air trapping on CT in young men. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:336–40.
  19. Stoel BC, Bakker ME, Stolk J, Dirksen A, Stockley RA, Pittulainen E, et al. Comparison of the sensitivities of 5 different computed tomography scanners for the assessment of the progression of pulmonary emphysema: a phantom study. Invest Radiol 2004;39:1–7.
  20. Coxson HO. Computed tomography and monitoring of emphysema. Eur Respir J 2007;29:1075–7.
  21. Lynch DA, Al-Qaisi MA. Quantitative computed tomography in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Thorac Imaging 2013;28:284–90.
  22. Yasunaga K, Chérot-Kornobis N, Edmé JL, Sobaszek A, Boulenguez C, Duhamel A, et al. Emphysema in asymptomatic smokers: quantitative CT evaluation in correlation with pulmonary function tests. Diagn Interv Imaging 2013;94:609–17.
  23. Yahaba M, Kawata N, Iesato K, Matsuura Y, Sugiura T, Kasai H, et al. The effects of emphysema on airway disease: correlations between multi-detector CT and pulmonary function tests in smokers. Eur J Radiol 2014;83:1022–8.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.