The Indian Journal of Chest Diseases and Allied Sciences

Register      Login

VOLUME 62 , ISSUE 1 ( January-March, 2020 ) > List of Articles

Original Article

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Under Local Anesthesia: Real-time Experience Over Two Years in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India

Raj Kumar, Parul Mrigpuri, Vikrant, Sonam Spalgais

Keywords : Lymph node, EBUS-TBNA, Anesthesia, Tuberculosis, Sarcoidosis

Citation Information : Kumar R, Mrigpuri P, Vikrant, Spalgais S. Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Under Local Anesthesia: Real-time Experience Over Two Years in a Tertiary Care Hospital in North India. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 2020; 62 (1):19-22.

DOI: 10.5005/ijcdas-62-1-19

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 07-11-2022

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; The Author(s).


Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is usually performed under deep sedation or conscious sedation. We describe the diagnostic yield and complications of EBUS-TBNA performed under local anesthesia. Methods: Patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA at our center from February 2016 to April 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. All procedures performed under local anesthesia using lignocaine were assessed for sampling adequacy, diagnostic yield, cough during endoscopic procedure and complications. Results: Thirty-four patients underwent EBUS-TBNA under local anesthesia. Mean age was 41.1 years with male to female ratio of 1:1. Mean (standard deviation) dose of lignocaine used was 311.6 (16.4) milligram and mean (standard deviation) duration of the procedure was 23.7 (3.78) minutes. Sample adequacy rate was 88.2%. The diagnostic yield of the procedure was 60%. In 91.1% of patients, cough was absent or did not interfere with EBUS-TBNA. Complications related to EBUS were observed in three (8.8%) patients and were minor and self-limiting. None of the patients required escalation of care. Conclusion: EBUS-TBNA performed under local anesthesia was found to be safe and was associated with an acceptable diagnostic yield.


PDF Share
  1. Rai SP, Bhattacharyya D, Choudhary RK. Flexible bronchoscopy in the evaluation of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. Med J Armed Forces India 2007;63:26–28.
  2. Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Srinivasan R, Singh K. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features of mediastinal tubercular lymphadenopathy. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58:819–23.
  3. McManus TE, Haydock DA, Alison PM, Kolbe J. Isolated mediastinal adenopathy: The case for mediastinoscopy. Ulster Med J 2008;77:97–101.
  4. Kitami A, Suzuki T, Usuda R, Masuda M, Suzuki S. Diagnostic and therapeutic thoracoscopy for mediastinal disease. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;10:14–8.
  5. Gossot D, Toledo L, Fritsch S, Celerier M. Mediastinoscopy vs thoracoscopy for mediastinal biopsy: results of a prospective non-randomized study. Chest 1996;110:1328–31.
  6. Herth F, Becker HD, Ernst A. Conventional vs endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a randomized trial. Chest 2004;125:322–5.
  7. Ye T, Hu H, Luo X, Chen H. The role of endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) for qualitative diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy: a prospective analysis. BMC Cancer 2011;11:1–6.
  8. Hata Y, Sakamoto S, Otsuka H, Sato K, Sato F, Makino T, et al. EBUS-TBNA-related complications in a patient with tuberculous lymphadenopathy. Intern Med 2013;52:2553–9.
  9. Kang HJ, Hwangbo B, Lee GK, Nam BH, Lee HS, Kim MS, et al. EBUS-centred versus EUS-centredmediastinal staging in lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax 2014;69:261–8.
  10. C hen CH, Liao WC, Wu BR, Chen CY, Chen WC, Hsia TC, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound changed the world of lung cancer patients: a 11-Year institutional experience. PLoS One 2015;10:1–10.
  11. P lat G, Pierard P, Haller A, Hutsebaut J, Faber J, Dusart M, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound and positron emission tomography positive mediastinal lymph nodes. Eur Respir J 2006;27:276–81.
  12. Wallace MB, Pascual JM, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, McComb BL, Crook JE, et al. Minimally invasive endoscopic staging of suspected lung cancer. JAMA 2008;299:540–6.
  13. Yasufuku K, Chiyo M, Koh E, Moriya Y, Iyoda A, Sekine Y, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2005;50:347–354.
  14. Lechtzin N, Rubin HR, White P, Jr, Jenckes M, Diette GB. Patient satisfaction with bronchoscopy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1326–31.
  15. S arkiss M, Kennedy M, Riedel B, Norman P, Morice R, Jimenez C, et al. Anesthesia technique for endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph node. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2007;21:892–6.
  16. Kennedy MP, Shweihat Y, Sarkiss M, Eapen GA. Complete mediastinal and hilar lymph node staging of primary lung cancer by endobronchial ultrasound: moderate sedation or general anesthesia? Chest 2008;134:1350-1.
  17. Yarmus LB, Akulian JA, Gilbert C, Mathai SC, Sathiyamoorthy S, Sahetya S, et al. Comparison of moderate versus deep sedation for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2013;10:121–6.
  18. Aswanetmanee P, Limsuwat C, Kabach M, Alraiyes AH, Kheir F. The role of sedation in endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration: systematic review. Endosc Ultrasound 2016;5:300–6.
  19. Agostini L, Facciolongo N, Lusuardi M, Casalini E, Galeone C, Lasagni L, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration under conscious sedation with meperidine and midazolam. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2017;87:768.
  20. D hooria S, Sehgal IS, Gupta N, Aggarwal AN, Behera D, Agarwal R. Diagnostic yield and complications of EBUS-TBNA performed under bronchoscopist-directed conscious sedation. J Bronchol Intervent Pulmonol 2017;24:7–14.
  21. Casal RF, Lazarus DR, Kuhl K, Nogueras-González G, Perusich S, Green LK, et al. Randomized trial of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration under general anesthesia versus moderate sedation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191:796–803.
  22. Arslan Z, Ilgazli A, Bakir M, Yildiz K, Topçu S. Conventional vs endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphadenopathies. Tuberk Toraks 2011;59:153–7.
  23. Cox B, Durieux ME, Marcus MA. Toxicity of local anaesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2003;17:111–36.
  24. Graham DR, Hay JG, Clague J, Nisar M, Earis JE. Comparison of three different methods used to achieve local anesthesia for fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1992;102:704–7.
  25. Mendes de Leon C, Bezel R, Karrer W, Brändli O. Premedication in fiberoptic bronchoscopy from the patient's and the physician's viewpoint: a randomized study for the comparison of midazolam and hydrocodone. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1986;116:1267–72.
  26. Du Rand IA, Blaikley J, Booton R, Chaudhuri N, Gupta V, Khalid S, et al. British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults. Thorax 2013;68:i1–i44.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.